I find the idea of English pronunciation classes being
discriminatory a very interesting one. I would agree with what was said
in class and in the article about intelligibility being the most important goal
when correcting or learning pronunciation with a non-native speaker. That
being said, I think it is also important to recognize that there currently
exists stigma in many ways against those who speak with an accent, especially a
strong one which may be intelligible but require extra effort to understand
when compared to a native English speaker. (It's also interesting to note the
difference in, for example, American reactions to different accents in English-
British, Scottish, Australian, French, Italian, and other "Western"
accents are frequently considered sexy or intriguing, while accents of ESL
speakers from most other parts of the world are not seen in as glamorous a
light). Correcting this stigma is important, but will take time- for
students looking to find a job next year, they may want or need a pronunciation
class that can help them move past the stigma (perhaps unconscious) of
potential employers, etc, associated with a strong non-native accent.
Since the classes are voluntary and it wasn't a group of international
students who filed the complaint, it would seem that the students affected
either do not feel that their identities are threatened by a pronunciation
class, or place a higher priority on the potential gains from assimilating
their pronunciation than they do on avoiding this linguistic assimilation.
While there are delicate questions to consider here, I feel that
the focus should be on reducing stigma among native English speakers towards
others, on increased foreign language learning among native English speakers
(which provides the best opportunity to appreciate how incredible it is that so
many people learn English as a second language and then take classes, work,
etc, in that second or third or fourth language), and on conversations about
protecting other languages as English becomes increasingly common worldwide.
Taking course options away from English learners does not, in my opinion,
further these goals in a productive way.
No comments:
Post a Comment